Could not complete your request

Pick Your Cotton Carefully

Continental® guarantees that the cotton we use does not come from Uzbekistan. (Continental® uses Turkish, Indian & Egyptian cotton.)

To substantiate this, each of the factories Continental® uses have prepared the paperwork for both the organic and non-organic cotton, to show the source of the raw cotton. It took only four days to prepare the documentation, and the documentation had to show the receipt of the cotton as it travels up the supply chain of the manufacturing processes.

With that guaranteed, you can now sleep a little better at night, however, if you wish to learn more, read on... but I warn you, it does not make happy reading if you are in any way involved in purchasing or re-selling cotton apparel...

Uzbekistan is the third largest cotton exporter in the world. About one in four of all cotton garments sold in the UK contain a percentage of Uzbek cotton fibres. The first problem is that the Uzbek regime is responsible for torture, slave labor and a continuing environmental disaster on an unimaginable scale - all in the name of cotton production. The second problem is that they don't tell you on the clothing labels in stores where the cotton fibres came from, just where the garment was manufactured.  The truth about the Uzbek cotton industry makes horrific reading, and I only reproduce here a fraction of what I have read. I do this, not to be sensationalist, but because we can actually do something about this, by raising awareness in our industry, and encouraging other manufacturers to follow suit or lose their reputation - and ultimately lose sales. In the near future, in the current climate, unethical business practises will simply not be profitable.

Don't take my word for it. What follows is abreviated passages from the executive summary from the International Crisis Group report on Central Asian cotton of March 2005:

The Uzbek cotton industry is a disastrous aberration created by Soviet central planning. Over 80% of the loss of water from the Aral Sea is due to irrigation for the Uzbek cotton industry, so it is responsible for one of the World’s greatest environmental disasters. On most agricultural land in Uzbekistan, cotton has been grown as a monoculture for fifty years, with no rotation. This of course exhausts the soil and encourages pests. As a result the cotton industry employs massive quantities of pesticide and fertiliser. As a result it is not just that the Aral Sea is disappearing, but that and fertilisers, with no rotation.the whole area of the former sea suffers appalling pollution, reflected in appalling levels of disease.

Uzbek farm workers are tied to the farm. They need a propusk (visa) to move away – which they won’t get. The state farm worker normally gets two dollars a month. Their living and nutritional standards would improve greatly if, rather than grow cotton, they had a little area to grow subsistence crops.

There are no independent research institutes allowed in Uzbekistan. In fact the proportion of the population enslaved on state cotton farms is closer to 60% than 40%.

The cotton industry in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan contributes to political repression, economic stagnation, widespread poverty and environmental degradation. The economics of Central Asian cotton are simple and exploitative. Millions of the rural poor work for little or no reward growing and harvesting the crop. The considerable profits go either to the state or small elites with powerful political ties. Forced and child labor and other abuses are common.

This system is only sustainable under conditions of political repression, which can be used to mobilise workers at less than market cost. Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are among the world's most repressive states, with no free elections. Opposition activists and human rights defenders are subject to persecution. The lack of a free media allows many abuses to go unreported. Unelected local governments are usually complicit in abuses, since they have little or no accountability to the population. Cotton producers have an interest in continuing these corrupt and non-democratic regimes.

The industry relies on cheap labor. Schoolchildren are still regularly required to spend up to two months in the cotton fields in Uzbekistan. Despite official denials, child labor is still in use in Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. Students in all three countries must miss their classes to pick cotton. Little attention is paid to the conditions in which children and students work. Every year some fall ill or die.

Photos showing the condition of state-forced child labor in the Uzbek cotton fields are not sensationalist; they are very much the everyday conditions in which hundreds of thousands of Uzbek children are forced to live for months.

Women do much of the hard manual labour in cotton fields, and reap almost none of the benefits. Cash wages are minimal, and often paid late or not at all. In most cotton-producing areas, growers are among the poorest elements in society.
The environmental costs of the monoculture have been devastating. The depletion of the Aral Sea is the result of intensive irrigation to fuel cotton production. The region around the sea has appalling public health and ecological problems. Even further upstream, increased salinisation and desertification of land have a major impact on the environment. Disputes over water usage cause tension among Central Asian states.

Reforming the cotton sector is not easy. Central Asian cotton is traded internationally by major European and U.S. corporations; its production is financed by Western banks, and the final product ends up in well-known clothes outlets in Western countries. But neither the international cotton trading companies nor the clothing manufacturers pay much attention to the conditions in which the cotton is produced. Nor have international organisations or IFIs done much to address the abuses. U.S. and EU subsidy regimes for their own farmers make long-term change more difficult by depressing world prices.

Three years ago Craig Murray, our British ambassador to Uzbekistan, had a sense-of-humour failure about Britain condoning torture there. His fate? The Foreign Office fired him. Labor or Conservative? It doesn't really matter does it, they are all the same.

To effect immediate change, you should demand that your apparel manufacturer state on their garment labels where their cotton comes from, and that it does not come from Uzbekistan. With the vast volume of T-shirts bought and sold, the message will quickly spread, and High Street retail will follow.

Why am I doing this? As a large user of cotton, and with our influential position in the T-shirt industry, Continental Clothing has an opportunity, if not even a responsibility, to raise awareness and promote consumer action on issues where we feel strongly - such as the state orchestrated child slavery in Uzbekistan. The wonderful thing is that it costs us nothing, and may switch cause consumers to question the garments they buy and so switch them on to cotton garments which guarantee that certain positive social and environmental conditions are met - such as Continental garments. This is often the way with ethical and environmental choices, initially they appear expensive and difficult, until you realise they can be sustainable choices for a longer term and more profitable future. So yes, we are doing this because we can, and also for personal gain. If you follow the same formula, you may benefit in exactly the same way.

Insight into Continental

BAFTA-winning company Insight News TV, is to film at the Continental London offices, for a documentary film about Uzbekistan for BBC News Night.

Insight News is to interview company spokesperson Mariusz Stochaj about the origin of the cotton Continental use in their T-shirts and apparel. Many clothing companies, particularly High Street retailers, have claimed it's too difficult to find out the source of the cotton they use. Continental dispute this, and say that it takes no more than an email or phone call to the supplier.

Continental spokesperson Mariusz Stochaj spoke out “Factories will bend over backwards for their customers, and especially for the large retailers and fashion brands. Can you really imagine Primark or Matalan being told ‘No’ by any of their suppliers? That would never happen. There is almost nothing they will not do for them, and providing documentary proof of the origin of the cotton, if requested, if the least of their many problems as manufacturers.”

Each of the factories Continental
® uses, in Turkey, China and India, have prepared the paperwork for both the organic and non-organic cotton, to show the source of the raw cotton. It took only four days to prepare the documentation, and the documentation had to show the receipt of the cotton as it travels up the supply chain of the manufacturing processes.

Mariusz continued, “It was the Turkish factory owner who pointed out the obvious, he said ‘it is only those who are trying to hide something, who cannot provide receipts for the cotton purchases when asked.’ “

Insight News have been filming undercover in Uzbekistan, at great risk to their personal safety, both the 2007 Uzbek ‘Cotton Conference’, and the school children working in the fields alongside their teachers, picking the cotton. Continental
® Clothing Company, by being the only company to take a stand and to prove the origin of their cotton, and on three continents, is providing the ammunition to confront and question the retailers who purposefully conceal the origin of their cotton.

Mariusz Stochaj: “Consumers deserve to have this information. If a consumer could choose between a cotton T-shirt made using Uzbek cotton, picked by school children forcibly taken from their classes by their government, or a T-shirt made with ‘clean’ cotton, I’m hoping that they’d choose the latter.”

Continental
® now label their garments with the country of origin of the cotton, following the recommendation of the Environmental Justice Foundation.

You can see Insight News award winning work, including Blood Diamond, at www.insightnewstv.com

The film is to air on BBC early November.

CONTINENTAL® PRESS RELEASE - 10 AUG 2007.




Continental Fights Child Slave Labor in Uzbekistan

“Continental® Clothing has become, to my knowledge, the first large scale mainstream clothing company to ensure that none of its cotton comes from Uzbekistan. Uzbek cotton is a state monopoly, relying on slave labor and the forced labour of hundreds of thousands of children working in appalling conditions for little, or often no pay. Continental are to be congratulated on this initiative.”

Craig Murray, Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan.

 

Continental® Clothing Company has begun a major initiative, in collaboration with the Environmental Justice Foundation (www.ejfoundation.org), to help stop child slavery in Uzbekistan (amongst other environmental and social disasters that are happening on a unimaginable scale).

Continental
® is simply following the advice of the EJF, and in September will begin to label all their garments with the ‘Country of Origin’ of the cotton (normally it is the country of manufacture of the garment which is shown on the label), in order to assure consumers that the cotton does not originate from Uzbekistan, which is the world’s second largest exporter of raw cotton.

Director of Continental
® Clothing, Philip Charles states, “ Why am I really doing this? As a large user of cotton, and with our influential position in the T-shirt industry, Continental® Clothing has an opportunity, even if not a responsibility, to raise awareness and promote consumer action on issues where we feel strongly - such as the state orchestrated child slavery in Uzbekistan. And the situation in Uzbekistan is hideous – the state torturing dissenters by dipping them in boiling water! If a person knew they were clothed in Uzbek cotton, their skin would crawl.
The wonderful thing is that it costs us nothing to change our labels, and may cause consumers to question the T-shirts they buy and so switch them on to cotton T-shirts which guarantee that certain positive social and environmental conditions are met.” “There are many charities and individuals raising awareness of these critical issues, but they are all outside of our industry looking in; it takes the people personally and intimately involved in the cotton industry to make a stand, and it is us who can make the difference.”
“And I ask other apparel manufacturers to follow suit, and do the same. If this happens, we can create a snowball effect and force change through economic pressure. I liken this to what happened when Dolphin Friendly Tuna was introduced as a marketing tool, now you would be hard pressed to find non-DFT on supermarket shelves. I am afraid to say that there is politically no chance at all that the Karimov regime (in Uzbekistan) would voluntarily go along with any of the key recommendations (of the ILO). Compulsion is needed to force change, and a consumer boycott is the way to attain that.”

www.ejfoundation.org

Protecting People and Planet

Philip Charles, Continental® Director, sits on the EJF Development and Fundraising Council.

Print / PDF

Please enter your search phrase